Confiscation and Rebellion- Bearing Arms.com

In the same interview where President Barack Obama blatantly lied about background checks, he praised Australia’s gun control laws, which Charles  C.W. Cooke notes relied entirely upon confiscation:

Let me be clear, as Obama likes to say: You simply cannot praise Australia’s gun-laws without praising the country’s mass confiscation program. That is Australia’s law. When the Left says that we should respond to shootings as Australia did, they don’t mean that we should institute background checks on private sales; they mean that they we should ban and confiscate guns.

When President Obama praises gun confiscation, he’s praising the blatantly-unconstitutional infringement of the Second Amendment by the federal government. Let’s not mince words here: he’s supporting a policy, that if he or any future government attempted to implement it, will lead to a nationwide armed insurrection that would likely destroy our government and our way of life.

We’ve read articles before praising the theory of confiscation, and note the disturbing mindset of those who would see Americans stripped of their most basic of  human rights—the right to self-defense—under the threat of overwhelming government force.

Some have such a visceral hatred for gun owners that they seem to relish the thought of their fellow Americans being slaughtered (indeed, that seems to be the continuing hope of the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence, who have repeatedly referred to gun owners as “insurrectionists”).

These vengeful, hate-filled souls seem to have a fantasy that such a conflict would be a 1860s-style affair, where armed citizens resisting would line up in neat rows in an open field to be mowed down by government tanks and helicopters, much to their shrieking delight.

Those sick souls advocating for gun confiscation and civil strife seem to think that such a conflict would be something that would happen to “someone else.” They seem to have it in their minds that others in the military and law enforcement would do the dirty work of making their fantasies come to life, and that when the dust settled, they’d have a gun free nation, at no cost to themselves.

That is decidedly not how such a conflict would be fought, nor is it likely that they survive to see such an outcome.

They seem to forget that a significant percentage of the military and law enforcement officers that would be charged with enforcing their unconstitutional edicts are themselves, “gun nuts.” This is particularly true among the combat arms units within the military, police SWAT/ERT units and most sheriff’s departments, from the Sheriff’s themselves down through the ranks of their deputies.

Almost all of these individuals—currently, roughly 2 million soldiers, Marines, airmen, guardsmen, and reserves, and 800,000 law enforcement officers—swore their oaths to defend the Constitution, not any particular government, political party, or administration.

A significant number of would resign outright if the government ordered them to confiscate the arms of America citizens. Many others would defect as opportunity allowed, bringing along their expertise, intelligence, and perhaps their weaponry to wage war against the government. Others would remain on the job, but would not enforce the confiscation orders with any enthusiasm, and might stay on the job merely to pass along intelligence to their allies fighting on the side of the Constitution.

Those that defect would join a resistance composed of recently detached military combat veterans from the Afghan and Iraq wars with an intimate knowledge of insurgency and counterinsurgency tactics. It is impossible to know just how many of these veterans or others among the 80 million gun owners in this nation would choose to participate in active or passive resistance, but the figure would almost assuredly dwarf the number of poorly trained insurgents our military faced overseas in battles that continue to this day.

The remaining combined forces of government, now numbering something less than 1.5 million, would be charged with securing a nation of 318 million souls and 3.794 million square miles, not knowing who their enemies are, knowing that they and their families would be targets 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 a year, every year, in a war without front lines, a clearly defined enemy, or rules of engagement.

From Bearingarms.com

Read More

Raising Minimum Wage and Global Warming: The final Nail in the Coffin of the Economy, Freedom and Security.

In the last few weeks and in the coming months leading up to state elections this fall, you will hear the liberal candidates ramble on about how raising the minimum wage will help the economy grow and that global warming is real and dangerous, so we must punish industry for their evil pollution by taxing and laying down more restrictive policies  i.e. cutting emissions from coal power plants by 30%.

I hate to break the news for the all the moon bats out there in la-la land, but making small business pay more for unskilled labor will only carry the increased cost to the consumer, causing the cost of living to increase proportionate to the increase of pay. On the flip side, government "stay at home benefits" will have to increase to cover the increased cost of living, leaving our country more in debt and less able to pay for vital defense costs which constitutionally is the most important job of government.

No matter if you believe in Global Warming or not, one fact should be clear to all liberty loving Americans, taxing corporations for pollution WILL NOT help fight to protect the environment.  For instance, how Obama has circumvented the Congress by directing the EPA to set standards to force coal powered power plants to invest BILLIONS to meet the standard, which will force energy costs to raise dramatically across the board that will only make Americans have less money to reinvest in the economy.

Why are Americans buying this? 

Fear, misinformation and class warfare.

Fear- Americans are growing fearful of each other because of the media push to saturate the American Media with the worst acts of violence and greed and not show the flip side of Americans banding together and stopping violent acts from occurring, meanwhile demonizing those who are by labeling Patriots and the Liberty Movement as terrorists.

  Misinformation- Remember Al Gore and the
other idiots crying the sky is falling with increased
temperatures  (for the last ten years has not raised) and more powerful storms that will kill millions......all lies to force opinion in their favor by fear not logic. Google how much Al Gore made from Carbon credits for proof.

Class warfare- Liberals while being the most wealthy class of politicians, constantly bash the Republican Party for rubbing elbows with the "top 1%" and not caring about the little guy, when in fact, it is the other way around. The wolf in sheep's clothing comes to mind.


Why is the current government(Obama) pushing climate change and wage increases?

Combine the increased cost of energy with increased cost of labor and you have all but killed job creation and the U.S. Economy in one large swoop. When any population becomes dependent on government benefits to survive you have effectively created a voting base who has no choice but to vote for those who oppress them, which effectively kills the voice of the American people and meaningful reform. Don't forget gun control either.....





Look at immigration and how Obama is allowing MILLIONS of illegals to move in. Why? 


Obama and the Democrats want to create voters, hence the push against Voter ID laws.  Another point that isn't being stressed is how many of these illegal criminals are terrorists from known enemies? Given the numbers, there could be major attacks on all major cities at once and there is no way to know because the safety of non-Americans is more important than that of Americans who our elected officials have sworn to protect.

How do we roll back government and rein in the power back to the people?

We must protest and actively become involved in the political process by any means. We must vote out anyone who wants to curb any rights given by god to the American People. Vote smart, be diligent and keep your aim true. Most importantly, when a friend, co-worker or family member brings up the myths about global warming or wage increases, please take the time to inform them of the truth and how what they're saying will only hurt our country.

"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."

 ~John F. Kennedy

Read More

President Obama Claims "Gun violence is off the charts." Another LIE.

“Levels of gun violence are off the charts,” Obama said. ” There is no advanced developed country on Earth that would put up with this.”

Obama argued that Americans should be “ashamed,” using the opportunity to bemoan his inability to pass gun control legislation.

“We’re the only country in the world where this happens and it happens once a week,” Obama said.

Obama went on to refute any link between mass shootings and mental health as well, instead blaming the ability of Americans to collect ammunition.

“It’s not the only country that has psychosis, and yet we kill each other in these mass shootings at rates that are exponentially higher than anyplace else,” Obama said. ” What’s the difference? The difference is these guys can stack up a bunch of ammunition in their houses.”

Invoking his role as parent, Obama also pushed the notion that American gun owners are collectively responsible for mass shootings.

“This country has to do a lot of soul searching,” Obama said. “This is becoming the norm. And we take it for granted in ways that, as a parent, are terrifying to me.”

The President even went as far as praising Australia’s gun confiscation program, claiming that “very severe” gun laws have helped the country.

“Couple of decades ago, Australia had a mass shooting, similar to Columbine or Newtown,” Obama said. “And Australia just said, well, that’s it, we’re not doing, we’re not seeing that again, and basically imposed very severe, tough gun laws, and they haven’t had a mass shooting since.”

Earlier that day, White House spokesman Josh Earnest told reporters that the President is “always” looking for ways to “unilaterally” act on gun control.

Read More HERE

Read More