February 8, 2014


In recent years with the advent of small portable video cameras and the internet, many citizens are now taking it upon themselves to film the police. In doing so, many police officers have been caught and fired for their actions after lying about them. A lesser heard and talked about occurrence is the assault of minors by Police. Check out the facts at Police Brutality's Website.
For more information on recording the police check out Copblock's website.


Police break kids arm.


Police attack women and children with weapons and dogs



Police Officer Attacks 13 year old for skateboarding



Mother and children are fired upon while in their minivan



Mother physically attacked in front of her child for shop lifting



Special needs boy is attacked by police officer for no reason.

February 7, 2014

Over the last couple years China has continually asserted its rights over the Senkaku Islands and surrounding territorial waters. In 1969, it was announced that under the seabed around the island chain there was possibly oil and natural gas reserves. Since then, Taiwan and China have continually tried to claim ownership of the islands. In 1971, the Japanese regained control of the islands for the first time since 1945, after the United States gave them back after taking them in WWII.

In 2006, tensions between Japan, Taiwan and China amplified when vessels from China and Taiwan carrying protesters circumnavigated the disputed islands, causing the Japanese Coast Guard to step in and block them. Then in 2008 Chinese Coast Guard Vessels approached within .04 nautical miles of the main island. In July 2012, Coast Guard Vessels from Taiwan and Japan collided while escorting Taiwanese protesters. In 2013, China and Taiwan sent fighter jets into Japanese air space, prompting the Japanese to issue a stern warning.  Most recently, Defense Minister Itsunori Onodera, admitted that a Chinese frigate had weapons locked on a Japanese destroyer and helicopter, with the Japanese destroyer only three kilometers apart. To date, that encounter was the closest the two countries have come to full blown war. Meanwhile, The United States has remained steadfast on its position that that Japanese have ownership of the uninhabited islands.



In Washington D.C. Secretary of state John Kerry vowed that the U.S. would defend the Japanese against attack, including over the islands claimed by China.

"That includes with respect to the South China Sea," he(John Kerry) said, before correcting himself to say the East China Sea, where China and Japan have conflicting claims.

Secretary Kerry also reaffirmed the 1960 treaty that states the U.S. will defend to the death its allies in the region.  In response to the defensive stance the U.S. and Japan have taken; China imposed a must identify rule for planes flying over the area. The United States flat out said they will not comply.

What does China have to gain from winning the Islands from Japan? War with us. War between super powers most of the time results from one owing the another a large percentage of their currency. I.E. China who owns 1.4 trillion dollars of our debt and with another 3.2 trillion owned by foreign governments.

If China does declare war on us it probably will happen after the year 2024, when its projected that China's Economy will surpass that of the United States. If and when war is declared and after some time has passed and both sides suffer equal destruction the two superpowers will probably agree to stop the war and work out a deal. What do you think will be the first item of discussion? Reimbursement of the debt owned to China. Let's face it, we cannot pay it now, let alone after fighting a world war, so what could the USA do? One of the only things they have left, land within the United States. Your house, town or even state could be a territory of a foreign country. Seem to far out? Look what we did to Germany and Japan after World War II.

 Lastly, what if Japan and China are working together in someway to corner us into war. After all, the prime minister chose to attend the memorial of the fallen Japanese soldiers over the memorial that symbolizes the end of WWII. Time will tell.












For those who have served these videos might bring a smile on your face. For those who haven't served hopefully you will be inspired by the brave men and women who volunteer for this training. Please feel free to share a story about basic training in the comment sections. If you want to see me getting o.c. sprayed click here.

The Marines



The Navy



The Air force



The Coast Guard



Army

No description needed.  Enjoy.


























The President of Uruguay, Jose Mujica has achieved global recognition and criticism for his efforts to legalize marijuana, which overwhelmingly succeeded in January of this year. President Mujica and the left-wing liberal group Frente Amplio, have openly supported legalization since the 1980's and Mujica has been on  record stating that marijuana has an almost spiritual effect on people.   


Jose Mujica (AFP Photo / Miguel Rojo)
"Jose Mujica once said that he’s been looking for god but [hasn’t] found him yet. By legalizing marijuana and opening the doors of spiritual happiness to the young, he might not have found the god of other nations…, but he certainly has followed in the footsteps of Jesus when he said ‘Let the children come to me. Don't stop them! For the Kingdom of Heaven belongs to those who are like these,’" 

With such rhetoric about the heavenly qualities of the still largely illegal substance, it is no wonder the Nobel Peace Price could be in his future. After all, why not trust the opinion of a organization that gave the same prize to President Obama who to date has killed more people with drone strikes than any other president. 

So why would the world's more powerful and influential elite potentially give the award to a pothead? Maybe it's because if the regular Joe is stoned all the time without any negative legal repercussions, he will become more distracted by less meaningful issues and events, leaving the public in even less control of their destinies and willpower to resist the coming global change. 

Another aspect of the changing view of the elite towards the legalization effort could be attributed to the ability to tax, regulate and control even more of the wealth of the world's population. In the USA the government at state and federal levels would have to setup agencies to enforce policies relating to the sale and consumption of the plant. It would also legitimize illegal drug cartels in countries like Mexico, which are publicly known to have working connections with the DEA, like operation Fast and Furious which funneled money and automatic weapons across the border to destabilize the region and to push an unpopular gun control movement in the U.S. 

Not only will the globalist elite control most of the wealth, they will be able to push a drug on the masses that will only help them to achieve complete control by rendering the masses sedated and distracted by it.


*Disclaimer* The Mindful Patriot is not against legalization and holds to the libertarian principle that all men should have the ability to consume whatever they wish without any governmental interference.


                                             

Those of us who follow theories of the New World Order think we have it figured out enough to point fingers at those who hold the power, yet I propose a new theory called the Triangle's Shadow Theory. You are probably saying " that's just the pyramid" well that's right, but that's not the focus. The focus is in the shadows, where the truth lives.

First lets look at the Triangle's Shadow Theory and follow the path to the base. On the left you have the interests of the people and on the right you have the interests of  the elite.  Most Americans want to earn money through labor of some kind and some just want a check  (useful idiots) . Banks give loans and credit to industry of all kinds and hire according to earnings and to social & economic factors which are directly related to their area of expertise. Buyers of their services and or labor follow suit in proportion to cost vs. profit. Industry hires from the most qualified pool of applicants, mainly college educated, skilled labor or tradesmen who have completed higher education of some sort. To weaken the population, the banks force industry to move overseas lessening the need and eroding the collective I.Q. hence leaving the populace dependent on the media and equally at the mercy of the banks. 




Media tells the population what is relevant and what problems to worry about by limiting information. Thus, everything fits into an agenda(media bias). The direct result is policy creation or reform, which bends the will of government in the direction of the elite. Government then proposes solutions to the problems that didn't exist in the first place, causing a snowball effect and a growing feeling of dire need for more change.

While the above is occurring, in the shadow the true agenda is playing out. The population starts to believe they need the solution and submit to the will of those who have the "solution". At the same time, those who are awake to the reality of the true agenda, resist the agenda proposed by the media and by default the people who believe it. Government uses force and threat of death to make those who resist comply to the solution and there by framing the resistors as a problem that force by government can fix. thus they achieve the New World Order through majority consent.

The Triangle's Shadow Theory works because of a basic human instinct which some call "herd mentality" or in other words don't think just follow because everyone else is. Have you ever walked by a dark alleyway or by someone who just gave you that eerie feeling because their face was hard to see? Most people have experienced it and the typical response is to shrug it off; or push it out of their minds because it isn't comfortable. In essence, this behavior is submission which is the last step and the most important for the New World Order to rise to power. 

UPDATE: Singer Avicii's Music Video "Wake Me Up" proves this theory? 

Why do some stars die at 27 years old? Click here to find out the shocking facts behind entertainment's largest and best kept secret.










February 6, 2014




Ethan Couch was 16 when he killed four friends, paralyzed another and caused one more numerous broken bones and internal injuries while drunk driving. At the time of the accident his blood alcohol was three times the legal limit. A judge ordered Couch to a rehabilitation center paid for by his parents who are wealthy, instead of 20 years in state custody. The Defense used what now is called the "Affluenza"defense, which consists of arguing that since your family is rich and your parents spoiled you, you shouldn't be held to the maximum extend of the law. Or what I like to call getting away with murder because you're rich.




Ethan Couch, 16, has been sentenced to 10 years probation for a June ...
This defense should trouble everyone who isn't considered wealthy because you, your family or friends could die at the hands of someone suffering from "Afflunenza" and never get justice.  Still not sure their wealth status had anything to do with it? Let's see what happens if your poor and decide to drive under the influence and cause bodily harm.

Kwaku-Wiredu-150x150.jpg
In Baltimore, M.D- Kwaku Wiredu was sentenced to fifteen years in prison with eight years suspended plus Wiredu was ordered to pay $150,000 dollars to the family of  the victim . Doesn't seem that bad? Well the victim, Jimmy Poleto wasn't killed, but suffered a life threatening injury which caused him to be in a coma for three months. Mr.Wiredu was convicted of second-degree assault and was not wealthy.

"Justice is the constant and perpetual will to allot to every man his due."
-Domitus Ulpian






February 5, 2014

Patriotic citizens gathered at gun ranges and gun clubs around the state of New York in solemn protest over the passing of the Safe Act, arguably the biggest infringement of the 2nd Amendment since it was written in the Bill of Rights.







The New York Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement Act of 2013 was enacted on January 15th, 2013. Governor Andrew Cuomo described it as "toughest" gun control law in the United States. Contained inside this unconstitutional law includes: Banning high capacity magazines, even ones that were bought legally. Background checks on all ammunition sales and sellers are required to report all sales to the state. All assault weapons must be registered.  Makes assault weapon features from two to one, essentially making most firearms illegal. Background checks on all sales, including private person to person. Allows police to seize firearms without warrant or court order, only by a reasonable belief the owner might commit a crime in the future.

Here's what our founding fathers had to say about the abridgment of the right to bear arms. 

"Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretence, raised in the United States. A military force, at the command of Congress, can execute no laws, but such as the people perceive to be just and constitutional; for they will possess the power, and jealousy will instantly inspire the inclination, to resist the execution of a law which appears to them unjust and oppressive." 
         ---Noah Webster, An Examination of the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution (Philadelphia 1787).

"Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of. Notwithstanding the military establishments in the several kingdoms of Europe, which are carried as far as the public resources will bear, the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. And it is not certain, that with this aid alone they would not be able to shake off their yokes. But were the people to possess the additional advantages of local governments chosen by themselves, who could collect the national will and direct the national force, and of officers appointed out of the militia, by these governments, and attached both to them and to the militia, it may be affirmed with the greatest assurance, that the throne of every tyranny in Europe would be speedily overturned in spite of the legions which surround it. "
         ---James Madison,The Federalist Papers, No. 46.

2nd amendment"To suppose arms in the hands of citizens, to be used at individual discretion, except in private self-
defense, or by partial orders of towns, countries or districts of a state, is to demolish every constitution, and lay the laws prostrate, so that liberty can be enjoyed by no man; it is a dissolution of the government. The fundamental law of the militia is, that it be created, directed and commanded by the laws, and ever for the support of the laws."
         ---John Adams, A Defence of the Constitutions of the United States 475 (1787-1788)
"
A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises, I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind. Games played with the ball, and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun therefore be your constant companion of your walks."
        --- Thomas Jefferson to Peter Carr, 1785. The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, (Memorial Edition) Lipscomb and Bergh, editors
            .american-patriot

I stand with these New York Patriots and the founders of this great nation by saying no one will take my right to bear arms away from me. MOLON LABE.






The days of peace officers who interact with the community as neighbors and fellow law-abiding citizens has been dead for sometime. Check points, military hardware and a growing view that every citizen is an evil terrorist or violent criminal, has all but destroyed the way police used to behave. If Mayberry existed today, Barney would have kill numbers in the hundreds and no one would question it.

In Fullerton, California Kelly Thomas a homeless man diagnosed with schizophrenia was brutally beaten to death for nothing more than contempt of cop. His death was confirmed to be directly caused by actions of police officers. In the video Officer Manny Ramos was overheard saying "Now you see my fists?" while putting on latex gloves. Thomas replied "Yeah, what about them?" Officer Ramos replied "They are getting ready to fuck you up."  A short time later, Kelly Thomas was non-responsive face down on the street. Five days later, Kelly Thomas was pronounced dead. Officer Manuel Ramos was charged with one count of second-degree murder and one count of involuntary manslaughter; Corporal Jay Cicinelli and Officer Joseph Wolfe were each charged with one count of felony involuntary manslaughter and one count of excessive force. All three pleaded not guilty. A jury would find them not guilty.





When Rodney King, a convicted felon was beaten by numerous L.A.P.D, riots consumed the black neighborhoods around the area. What was the public outcry for Kelly Thomas, a white homeless man? A hundred people with signs and a bunch of keyboard warriors spouting what the would do.








When I was a child, I would play with toy rifles in my front yard and no one would say a word.  In Santa Rosa, California, Sheriffs shot and killed a 13 year old boy for holding a toy rifle. Police only waited 8 seconds before deciding to shoot and kill the boy. Citing Officer safety. 




In Honolulu, an 17 year old boy suffered from severe mental illness was shot by police after the boy's school called the police to help control him.

 Salt Lake City, Utah- Danielle Willard an unarmed woman was shot in the head and killed while in the parking lot of an apartment complex during a narcotics stakeout. Officers claimed she was trying to run them over. Video evidence surfaced and disapproved the officers statements.



Brian Newt Beaird 51, was shot dead by LAPD officers after a car chase. Brian had pulled over and stepped out  of his car with no weapons and was quickly executed by pursuing officers.



 




Sioux Fall, South Dakota- Jacob Westberg was shot dead on his door step because a concerned citizen reported that he was suicidal. Before the shooting Jacob's brother arrived on the scene and told the police he  could calm his brother but police pushed him aside.

Orlando, Florida- Travis Mcneil was shot to death by officer Orosa when he pulled Mr. Mcneil. Officer Orosa stated he should have followed my commands as justification for the killing.

Dallas, Texas- Police shot an mentally challenged man. Bennett 52, suffering from schizophrenia was shot after police claimed Bennett lunged at them. Video emerged and contradicts the officers statements.

This is not even close to the amount of  police shooting citizens in this country on a weekly basis. In fact, you are eight times more likely to be killed by a police officer than in a terrorist attack.














February 4, 2014

Since 9/11 the government has used the shock factor of the terrible event to push citizens into practicing slogans like "See something, say something" which instructs citizens to report anything they think is strange. This only helps to push the idea that everyone is a suspect and it should also be noted that it has had a  negative effect on how police do their jobs, with a new report from the National Safety Center for Health stating that you are: 


"...8 times more likely to be killed by a police officer than in a terrorist attack."

Even with this data being readily available, schools around the country are now asking students personal questions about their families, effectively turning them into little narcs.

In Marinette, Wisconsin it was reported by WLUK Fox News 11 that students in grades 5-8 were asked to play a game in which a question was posed and if it applied to you, you would have to step forward. Some of the questions asked were “Do your parents drink?” and “Has anyone in your family been to jail?” But this is not an isolated event by any means.


In the Arlington High School in Tennessee, student were told to take a survey in which some of the questions asked involved their families opinion on abortion, what religion they practiced, if their parents owned firearms and lastly,what their parent's opinion on the legalization of marijuana was.

 The Blaze reported the perspective of parents and students regarding the survey:

"April Heath used Facebook as her sounding board after she says her daughter was given the questionnaire at school. In her post, she says her daughter was asked her if her parents owned guns; it also asked for the student’s opinion on the legalization of marijuana, abortion and what her religion is.
Student Phillip Beasley said, “It’s not that big of a deal, it’s just you don’t need to get into other people’s business that’s not yours, you know?”
“To tell you the truth I can’t think of any good reason to do that,” added grandparent Sharon Starlings. “It doesn’t seem right.”
Parents in Arlington say the questionnaire was out of line.
“I would be not OK with that,” said parent Martina Ashmore."

On the website Family Education.com a seven page web blog titled "100 Questions to Ask Your Parents" instructs children on what questions they should ask their parents. Some questions appear very inncocent while others are very disturbing,  some questions include:

1. When you were young, were you involved in any kind of political protests such as for the Civil Rights movement or against Vietnam? Why or why not?"

Are Schools a Soft Terror Target? 4. How often do you go over the speed limit?
8. Did you ever get arrested for anything? If not, did you ever do anything you should have gotten in trouble for if anyone had found out?
34. If there were a war against the United States, how would you feel about volunteering for duty?
 
Why do schools need this sort of information and why do self described educational websites promote and help train children to turn their backs on the right to privacy in the home? Is it to help the establishment collect intelligence on American families? Is it a larger plot to further erode civil rights by teaching children they are flexible and in some cases non-existent? We will have to wait and see.




Subscribe to RSS Feed Follow me on Twitter!