February 10, 2014



The conservative legal group Judicial Watch uncovered an email that puts serious doubt on the U.S. government's claim that Osama Bin Laden was actually killed. The email which was sent by Adm.William McRaven ordered all pictures of the corpse to be destroyed or turned in to the C.I.A for black out, 11 days after the "killing" of Osama Bin Laden. The order was sent 10 days after the A.P. requested all information and pictures through the Freedom of Information Act.

Adm. McRaven who heads the U.S. Special Operations Command was investigated by the Pentagon Inspector General, who wrote the details of the email in a draft of their report but left it out of the final report.


What a convenient story. The media asks for documentation on the raid and on the killing of Osama and suddenly a scandal appears where an email was written by an Admiral detailing that all evidence must be destroyed including government documents? The Admiral lives, breathes and works in a clandestine, covert environment and knowing all he knows, decides to writes an email that he knew would be requested? It seems magicians are not the only people who understand the usefulness of misdirection.




Instead of fake pictures being leaked(which failed), they simply got a fall guy and claimed the non-release of photos was to respect Islam and prevent more violence. Looks more and more like this was a cover up of a botched raid, considering the downed helicopter and lack of video or photo evidence of the killing or body of Osama.




Most remember how the President and White House staff watched the live feed from the raid and how they looked stunned at the moment of Osama's death. What if that was the look of terror and disbelief of a failed raid? After the word that Osama was killed, Democrats paraded around in front of cameras expressing their love of the president and how great our government was in stopping a horrible terrorist that our government created,funded and deployed in the 1980's.

It seems the pressure to keep our leadership and government image in check outweighs the truth once again.




A Majority of Swiss citizens voted in favor of a referendum on Immigration reform, which marks the largest overhaul of Swiss policy in modern history. Included in the reform is language that now will limit immigration quotas and require Swiss Nationals be given priority in hiring over non-residents. Other member nations that are part of European Union are expected to be vocally opposed to the new regulations. 

Laurentt Fabius, Foreign Minister of France, as already called out leaders in Switzerland on what he views as a terrible choice by the Swiss people. 

"It us a vote that causes concern because it means that Switzerland Wants to withdraw into itself." Mr. Fabius told RTL radio
Is the European Union's dismay over Swiss  immigration reform really about human rights or is a concern that the Swiss decision is more reflective of future tough decisions that will have to occur to hold back the unstoppable collapse?




Viviane Reding, vice president of the European Commission which is the executive arm of the E.U. Said " (they)..could not pick and choose." and further added "it is a whole package they have signed up for."  Clearly the EU is scared of how this will change the view of current economic status in the E.U.

Switzerland currently is the third wealthiest country in Europe, with a GDP of $44,015.97 and Zurich located 408 meters above sea level on the lower end of Lake Zurich boosts the highest quality of life in the entire world, with a high level of investment, low corporate tax rate and high level of skilled labor. It's no wonder they are closing the borders, after all there will be future mass influx of economic refugees to wealthy countries. 

European officials are now in a echo chamber with most sharing the sentiment of Pia Ahrenkilde Hansen, spokeswoman for the EU who spoke with reporters in Brussels.


“We have been extremely clear about what it means to have free movement of people as part of our overall agreement with Switzerland, and we have established that this is an initiative that does run counter to the principle of free movement of people between the European Union and Switzerland,” 

Could it be the EU members are mad because the Swiss beat them to enacting policy and not taking what the EU believes is their fair share of responsibility for the less fortunate of the world? Most likely we will see more wealthy nations shutting their doors to save their own people. 





Subscribe to RSS Feed Follow me on Twitter!