The mass shooting that left 50 Muslims dead in Christ Church, New Zealand last week, has made the rounds on media sources across the world. The Shooter's goal outlined in his manifesto was to bring gun control and social divisiveness around the world.
Jacinda Ardern, The Prime Minister of New Zealand, has declared all guns like the shooter used will be banned. Not surprising, considering progressives/communists never hesitate to stand on the dead to push their agenda on people via threat of government force.
If just one person had a firearm, the shooter would have been stopped quickly. Sadly, it took the police (government) 30 minutes to stop the shooter's spree.
Now PM Jacinda Ardern wants all citizens to be at the mercy of the next shooter for up to 30 minutes.
Why?
Because black rifles are scary and evil. Not surprising, considering women are more likely to have..... " stronger emotional aversion to harmful action" In other words, be ineffective when it counts because of "feelings." So her way of standing up to the situation is emotional appeals to blame an object after the fact.
Also worth noting is the ban of videos, websites, and blogs discussing and sharing the historical record of this event because you know "feelings". A classic example of government acting like it knows better than its people. Disgusting.
The real citizens of NZ need to stand and hold on to their rights if not, they will be steamrolled into slavehood and dominated by foreign invaders who won't be as nice as their hosts when they achieve power.
Jacinda Ardern, The Prime Minister of New Zealand, has declared all guns like the shooter used will be banned. Not surprising, considering progressives/communists never hesitate to stand on the dead to push their agenda on people via threat of government force.
 |
| NZ Prime Minister bowing to Muslim Doctrine by covering her hair |
Now PM Jacinda Ardern wants all citizens to be at the mercy of the next shooter for up to 30 minutes.
Why?
Because black rifles are scary and evil. Not surprising, considering women are more likely to have..... " stronger emotional aversion to harmful action" In other words, be ineffective when it counts because of "feelings." So her way of standing up to the situation is emotional appeals to blame an object after the fact.
"Men, relative to women, show a stronger preference for utilitarian over deontological judgments, according to a new meta-analysis of 40 studies. This gender difference in moral decisions is caused by stronger emotional aversion to harmful action among women; the study found no evidence for gender differences in the rational evaluation of the outcomes of harmful actions." Science Daily
Also worth noting is the ban of videos, websites, and blogs discussing and sharing the historical record of this event because you know "feelings". A classic example of government acting like it knows better than its people. Disgusting.
The real citizens of NZ need to stand and hold on to their rights if not, they will be steamrolled into slavehood and dominated by foreign invaders who won't be as nice as their hosts when they achieve power.
.jpg)
