February 9, 2014

AT&T Labs has developed new software called Natural Voices, a text to speech engine which  will revolutionize voice synthesis. The software currently cost "thousands" but AT&T officials say the software can reproduce "the sounds, inflections and intonations of a human voice." The process of building the algorithm, requires 10-40 hours of prerecorded speech. The recordings are then sliced up into small pieces and entered into a high descriptive database. This method of reproducing a voice is called "concatenative speech synthesis", which AT&T refined to the point that the fragments of speech are the smallest ever seen.

If the private sector already has technology that can create a near perfect reproduction of someones voice, then it's a safe bet that this software has been used in the past and currently for disinformation propaganda.

In the article posted by this site titled "Russian FSB Uses Voice Cloning To Undermine The European Union.", followed how the Russian FSB have used this software to frame a diplomat and secretary of the EU, in the hopes to change the Ukrainians opinion in the conflict.  After posting that article, a few commentators doubted that voice cloning actually existed and if it did, then why did those who were claimed to be in the recording admit to it? Simple. Because exposing this technology would destabilize both population's trust in government, because many political skeletons would come out of the closet, perhaps one of those skeletons could be 9/11.

If Russia who had slipped behind America in software technology,  still had the ability to create a 100% match to any voice than the American intelligence and military complex must have equal or even better software many years before Russia did. If that's the case, could the Osama Bin Laden tapes been faked?After all, it is easy to get people on your side if you have a person and a face to blame. Speaking of blaming, the FBI never officially charged Bin Laden with plotting 9/11 and Osama's wanted poster never mentioned 9/11 at all (wanted poster PDF). Osama never officially took blame for the attacks.

Voice cloning does exist and it will become mainstream news when the governments who are using it, find something better. 

Synopsis: A widowed ex-DEA agent retires to what he thinks is a small peaceful town for the sake of his 10 year old daughter. The only problem is the peace doesn't last.

Jason Statham, James Franco, Winona Ryder. Izabelka Vidovic.

I decided to watch Home Front because once and a while I like to a watch a movie and not have to figure out the fine plot details or think about what I am watching for that matter, so naturally I picked a movie staring Jason Statham and for an added bonus it was written by Sylvester Stallone.

From the very first scene, actions pours out of this movie. Reminiscent of most Statham movies but with Statham playing a protective father and somewhat of an emotional character, greatly added to the reality of the role. What was more interesting was the dynamic between Franco and Statham.

First, Franco's character looked like a real Meth-head and 100% believable. Second, there is only one fight scene with them in it, which is rather interesting given the genre of movie. Wynonna's Character was rather good at playing a meth whore and she deserves an Oscar for the garage scene...seriously I think at this point it represents her career...screwed.

As the plot develops it does lure you in and make you root for the good guys and the finale is typical but offers a refreshing and realistic climax.

I was recently in a hospital visiting a loved one when I noticed a lot of nurses were wearing face masks, I asked if my loved one was on precautions and the nurse said no. I asked why then are you wearing a mask? The nurse happily answered my question by saying "I don't need or want one because I am healthy and I hardly get sick." I asked if it had anything to do with worries about what's in the shot, strangely she avoided the question. A little later, I asked another nurse and she replied with the same answers. Which makes me wonder, do they know something we don't?

In a recent study the CDC said that only 63.5% of health care workers were vaccinated in the 2010-2011 season. The CDC study confirmed my suspicion that a sizable number of highly educated professionals know the truth behind the chemicals that are added to the flu shot. 

Ingredients include:

" Ethylene glycerol is used as antifreeze. Ethylene glycerol and its toxic byproducts first affect the central nervous system, then the heart and finally the kidneys. Ingestion of sufficient amounts can be fatal.

Phenol, also known as carbolic acid, is used as a disinfectant and dye. Phenol was originally used as an antiseptic in surgery but it use was abandoned because it causes skin irritation. Before and during the Second World War, phenol injections were used by Nazi Germans as a means of rapid execution!

Formaldehyde is the chemical used for embalming. It is used in vaccines as a preservative. Formaldehyde is a known cancer-causing agent and it can also cause allergic reactions. Its use in cosmetics is banned in Sweden and Japan.

Aluminum is a toxic metal used as an additive in flu shots to promote antibody response. Aluminium is widely associated with Alzheimer's disease and studies have shown that people who received five or more flu shots during a 10-year period has 10 times higher risks of developing Alzheimer's Disease, compared to those who had fewer than two flu shots. Aluminium has also been shown to cause seizures and cancer in laboratory mice.

Antibiotics like Neomycin and Streptomycin are used as well as antibiotics, They are added to flu shots to kill any bacteria that may be present. These antibiotics can cause allergic reaction in some people.
(source flu-treatments.com)

The Canadian press published a new study that found the new N1H1 flu vaccine actually increased the risk of getting seriously sick, including getting the N1H1 virus.

Vancouver Sun wrote:
"Researchers, led by Vancouver's Dr. Danuta Skowronski, an influenza expert at the B.C. Centre for Disease Control, noticed in the early weeks of the [2009 H1N1] pandemic that people who got a flu shot for the 2008-09 winter seemed to be more likely to get infected with the pandemic virus than people who hadn't received a flu shot. Five studies done in several provinces showed the same unsettling results." 

So if vaccines contain toxic substances and give you the flu still, then why get the flu shot?
Because the CDC and government want you too! 

The pharmaceutical corporations, including Monsanto make billions on selling a whole bunch of medications and vaccines that cause more harm than good and not to mention they actively control the FDA.  Don't believe me? 

Check this out:

Michael R. Taylor director of the FDA, had been instrumental in overturning the Delaney Clause which prohibited any known carcinogenic from being put into food. With help from Mr. Taylor's research titled "The De Minimis Interpretation of the Delaney Clause: Legal and Policy Rationale"  it was determined to be SAFE for toxic substances to be put in food as long as it was at "acceptable levels" hence the "De Minimis".

Mr. Taylor was immediately accused of helping his good friends at Monsanto.

In 1992, Mr. Taylor was again instrumental in striking down rBGH labeling on milk and stated it posed "no human health risk". After all, cows treated with it produce 10-15% more milk and his best friends at Monsanto make the hormone. In Europe and Canada 95% of farmers have protested its use and activity do not use it.

The worst and most offensive act by Mr. Taylor was to combine the USDA with FDA to have one single agency accountable for providing "consistent and coordinated oversight". In other words, there's only one person to bribe and that is Mr. Taylor. 

Do you trust the government cares about your health? 

Those two nurses and the other 33% of health professionals seem to be onto something Monsanto clearly doesn't want you to know about.

Subscribe to RSS Feed Follow me on Twitter!