In the name of protecting people from being offended, New Zealand police are now rounding up its citizens who dare to own, watch or give away copies of the mosque shooter's video. Under New Zealand’s Films Videos and Publications Classification Act, which makes it an offense to possess “an objectionable publication.” 1984 anyone?
Objectionable? Who decides that? What is the definition that applies broadly? Or is it's enforcement determined by those who have an agenda?
Currently, all videos depicting Muslims, shooting, burning, running over and exploding their prisoners is widely available in NZ, with no legal threats to those who own and watch them. Again, it seems the Muslims are the darlings of the progressive/communist movement. They can kill all they want and the media won't even waste a second of airtime on it.
“We would like to remind people that it is an offence to distribute or possess an objectionable publication … which carries a penalty of imprisonment,” police said in a statement on Sunday."
It's also worth noting, New Zealand's prime minister is currently calling for gun bans. It seems the shooter's manifesto (which is also banned) is coming to reality. Sadly, if some of the Muslims had firearms, the shooting would have been stopped. Those who have watched the video could see how just one person with a firearm could have ended the attack swiftly.
After all, it only took 30 minutes for the government to stop the shooter. So why would a citizen need a firearm in the first place?
It's easy to see that media, world governments and certain segments of society are protecting the "religion of peace" from scrutiny and viciously attack those who call out the truth of what they really are. It appears the old saying "The enemy of my enemy is my friend" is alive and well.
Objectionable? Who decides that? What is the definition that applies broadly? Or is it's enforcement determined by those who have an agenda?
Currently, all videos depicting Muslims, shooting, burning, running over and exploding their prisoners is widely available in NZ, with no legal threats to those who own and watch them. Again, it seems the Muslims are the darlings of the progressive/communist movement. They can kill all they want and the media won't even waste a second of airtime on it.
"In the last 30 days, there were 106 Islamic attacks in 21 countries, in which 707 people were killed and 745 injured. "
“We would like to remind people that it is an offence to distribute or possess an objectionable publication … which carries a penalty of imprisonment,” police said in a statement on Sunday."
It's also worth noting, New Zealand's prime minister is currently calling for gun bans. It seems the shooter's manifesto (which is also banned) is coming to reality. Sadly, if some of the Muslims had firearms, the shooting would have been stopped. Those who have watched the video could see how just one person with a firearm could have ended the attack swiftly.
After all, it only took 30 minutes for the government to stop the shooter. So why would a citizen need a firearm in the first place?
It's easy to see that media, world governments and certain segments of society are protecting the "religion of peace" from scrutiny and viciously attack those who call out the truth of what they really are. It appears the old saying "The enemy of my enemy is my friend" is alive and well.
0 comments:
Post a Comment