December 11, 2018

The United Nations have convinced 150 countries to give up their sovereignty, their borders and their freedom of speech in the name of "diversity." 

The Pact uses doublespeak often to dupe countries and its people to adopt its agenda. Here's an example:

" The Global Compact reaffirms the sovereign right of States to determine their national migration policy and their prerogative to govern migration within their jurisdiction, in conformity with international law..."

So they recognize countries sovereignty in one sentence and then say it must conform to international law i.e. globalist dictate.  

Their claim that 150 countries have agreed to their doctrine and law on the matter is nothing more than an appeal to emotion. Out of those 150 countries, a majority DO NOT have immigrants actively seeking asylum. Why? Because they are the places that are losing their citizens. They signed on simply because it makes wealthier, more productive countries pay for their rejects. 


Here's another example of doublespeak:

"Rule of law and due process: The Global Compact recognizes that respect for the rule of law, due process and access to justice are fundamental to all aspects of migration governance. This means that the State, public and private institutions and entities, as well as persons themselves, are accountable to laws that are publicly promulgated, equally enforced and independently adjudicated, and which are consistent with international law. "


What about Freedom of speech? They have a whole objective covering it.

"..OBJECTIVE 17: Eliminate all forms of discrimination and promote evidence-based public discourse to shape perceptions of migration

 33. We commit to eliminate all forms of discrimination, condemn and counter expressions, acts, and manifestations of racism, racial discrimination, violence, xenophobia and related intolerance against all migrants in conformity with international human rights law. We further commit to promote an open and evidence-based public discourse on migration and migrants in partnership with all parts of society, that generates a more realistic, humane and constructive perception in this regard. We also commit to protect freedom of expression in accordance with international law, recognizing that an open and free debate contributes to a comprehensive understanding of all aspects of migration. To realize this commitment, we will draw from the following actions: .."

Evidence-based discourse to shape public perceptions of migration?

Look at France, look at England, look at Germany. Look at Sweden. Its citizens are being pushed out of towns and cities that their families have lived for generations. Women are being raped in broad daylight on the streets. Families are being targeted with violence for merely being non-muslim. Police have no-go zones, where they will not respond because these invaders won't let them in. What about the pedo-rings that plagued the U.K. for years and how the police wouldn't shut them down because of the perception that they would look racist.   I almost forgot to mention Sweden is now known as the "rape capital" of the world. 










These are the facts. Do you think the U.N. will acknowledge this? Don't hold your breath.

 Diversity is a code for destroying and destabilizing native populations.


What about benefits for these illegals? 

"OBJECTIVE 22: Establish mechanisms for the portability of social security entitlements and earned benefits 38. We commit to assist migrant workers at all skills levels to have access to social protection in countries of destination and profit from the portability of applicable social security entitlements and earned benefits in their countries of origin or when they decide to take up work in another country.  "

WTF?

The U.N. wants YOU to pay for illegals housing, food, and healthcare without your consent. 


Canada plans on adopting this agreement. 

Let that sink in. What if a liberal wins in 2020? Do you want our country to have no borders? Do you want your hard earned money paying for the rejects of another country? Do you want to be labeled a racist or any other "ist" word for merely voicing your opinion and saying no to this?  It will happen if we red blooded, freedom loving Americans do not vote and actively voice our opinion about this. 

You can read the U.N.'s garbage here.



0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to RSS Feed Follow me on Twitter!